Earthquake shakes wide area of southern Mexico

Associated Press
2011-05-05 11:00 PM
A moderately strong earthquake shook Mexico's Pacific coast resort of Acapulco on Wednesday, sending people fleeing into the streets. No damages or injuries were reported.The magnitude-5.8 quake occurred at 8:24 a.m. local time (1324 GMT) and was centered about 85 miles (138 kilometers) east of Acapulco, the U.S. Geological Survey reported on its website.
The quake occurred at a depth of nearly six miles (10 kilometers).
"We're surveying the areas where we know there are adobe houses that could collapse but so far we haven't received any reports of damages," said Roel Ayala, a civil protection spokesman for Guerrero state, where Acapulco is located.
The quake also swayed buildings in Mexico City, prompting some to evacuate.
Police surveying the city by helicopter and land found no damages or injuries, said Mexico City Public Safety Department Secretary Elias Miguel Moreno.

Strong earthquake rocks southern Mexico

Published May 05, 2011
| EFE
A magnitude-5.5 earthquake rocked southern Mexico on Thursday, just minutes after the seismic alert system in Mexico City was activated, but no injuries or damage have been reported, the National Seismology Service said.
The temblor occurred at 8:24 a.m., the service said, adding that the epicenter was located at a depth of 11 kilometers (6.8 miles) and some 55 kilometers (34 miles) west of Ometepec, a town on the Costa Chica of the southern state of Guerrero.
"The constant seismic alert (system) we have went off and, fortunately, after the first inspection we gave the city ... we found that there have not been any incidents as of now," Federal District Emergency Management Secretary Elias Miguel Moreno Brizuela said.
Five helicopters were used to conduct the initial inspection in Mexico City and no damage was spotted, Moreno Brizuela told Televisa.
Mexico, one of the countries with the highest levels of seismic activity in the world, sits on the North American tectonic plate and is surrounded by three other plates in the Pacific: the Rivera microplate, at the mouth of the Gulf of California; the Pacific plate; and the Cocos plate.
That last tectonic plate stretches from Colima state south and has the potential to cause the most damage since it affects Mexico City, which has a population of more than 20 million and was constructed over what was once Lake Texcoco.
The magnitude-8.1 earthquake that hit Mexico City on Sept. 19, 1985, was the most destructive to ever hit Mexico, killing some 10,000 people, injuring more than 40,000 others and leaving 80,000 people homeless.
The most recent powerful quake to hit Mexico was a magnitude-7.6 temblor that rocked Colima on Jan. 21, 2003.

Read more: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2011/05/05/strong-earthquake-rocks-southern-mexico/#ixzz1LfwqJvtM

Mexico mayor eyes new mobile quake alert this year


MEXICO CITY | Fri May 6, 2011 4:18pm EDT
(Reuters) - The mayor of Mexico City, a quake-prone metropolis of 20 million people, said on Friday he is planning a warning system that will send alerts directly to mobile phones seconds before an earthquake strikes.
The capital, built on top of a lake, suffered the devastating effects of an 8.1 magnitude quake in September 1985 that killed thousands when buildings were leveled across the city just as people got ready for work and school.
"I think we will have it in place soon, because it is not too complex," Mayor Marcelo Ebrard, a likely contender in the 2012 presidential election, told reporters. "We want it to be in place before September," he said.
Ebrard, who has adopted social media like Twitter to immediately communicate with citizens whenever there is a strong quake or streets are flooded after storms, said the capital's government is in talks with cell phone service providers to make the alert happen.
This year, a top executive from America Movil, parent of Telcel, the largest cell phone brand in Mexico, told Reuters that the company's existing network allowed for this kind of quake alerts to users.
Ebrard declined to mention which companies would be included in his quake alert plan for wireless phones. The city already has an alert broadcast through radio seconds before a quake hits, but it doesn't always trigger on time.
The mayor, who will compete with his political mentor Andres Lopez Obrador to become Mexico's leftist candidate for the 2012 elections, is also expanding a program offering bike rentals in a bid to curb traffic during rush hours.
By installing bicycle stations in two other busy business centers in the city -- wealthy Polanco and the historic downtown -- Ebrard expects to have more than 70,000 bikes working by the end of year.
(Additional reporting by Miguel Angel Gutierrez; editing by Anthony Boadle)

3.8 Earthquake Rattles San Francisco

Did you feel it? A small tremor shook San Francisco this afternoon at 2:57 p.m., right on the 105-year anniversary of the Great Quake of 1906. According to USGMC, the earthquake registered 3.8, located just south of San Francisco and 2 miles south of Pacifica. We'll update as soon as we know more about today's minor anniversary nudge.
Update: SF Appeal reports: "As is customary with earthquakes, BART service has been susp[ended while their tracks are inspected. If nothing untoward is discovered, service should resume in the next 10 minutes." Expect BART delays.
Contact the author of this article or email tips@sfist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Earthquake

U.S. map of earthquakes on December 15, 2009
Latest Earthquakes
Visit the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program to learn about earthquakes worldwide
Various FEMA earthquake publication covers
Publications
Posters, checklists, guides, reports, recommendations, examples, and more
NEHRP logo

Quick Links

Earthquake Information for

Learn about Earthquakes

Protecting Lives and Property

Technical Guidance

Outreach and Education

Japan utility delays decision on halting reactors

Updated 07:51 a.m., Saturday, May 7, 2011
  • A man walks by a burnt fishing boat in Kesennuma,  Miyagi Prefecture, northeastern Japan, Friday, May 6, 2011. Salvage companies are in town to drain oil from many boats washed ashore, burnt and sunk following the March 11 earthquake and tsunami before taking them out for scraps. Photo: Junji Kurokawa / AP
    A man walks by a burnt fishing boat in Kesennuma, Miyagi Prefecture, northeastern Japan, Friday, May 6, 2011. Salvage companies are in town to drain oil from many boats washed ashore, burnt and sunk following the March 11 earthquake and tsunami before taking them out for scraps. Photo: Junji Kurokawa / AP

TOKYO (AP) — A Japanese power company postponed its decision Saturday on a government request that it halt three reactors at a coastal nuclear plant until safety measures can be improved to guard against future earthquakes and tsunamis.
Shutting down the reactors would likely worsen power shortages expected this summer.
On Friday, Prime Minister Naoto Kan said he had asked Chubu Electric Power Co. to suspend operation of the reactors at the Hamaoka Nuclear Power Station in Shizuoka prefecture until a seawall is built and backup systems are improved. Though not legally binding, the request is a virtual order.
The government is reviewing the safety of the country's 54 atomic reactors since a March 11 earthquake and tsunami crippled the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in the north. The disaster left more than 25,000 people dead or missing on the northeast coast.
The Hamaoka plant, which is about 125 miles (200 kilometers) west of Tokyo in an area where a major quake is expected within decades, has been a major concern for years.
Chubu Electric executives failed to reach a decision after discussing the request Saturday afternoon and decided to meet again after the weekend, company official Mikio Inomata said.
At issue is how to make up for the power shortages that would result from the shutdown of the three reactors. Inomata said they account for more than 10 percent of the company's power supply.
Chubu Electric has estimated maximum output of about 30 million kilowatts this summer with the three Hamaoka reactors running, with estimated demand of about 26 million kilowatts.
"It would be tight," Inomata said, adding that officials are discussing the possibility of boosting output from gas, oil and coal-fueled power plants and purchasing power from other utility companies.
Kan said the shutdown request was for the "people's safety."
"If an accident occurs at Hamaoka, it could create serious consequences," he said Friday.
He noted that experts estimate there is a 90 percent chance that a quake with a magnitude of 8.0 or higher will strike the region within 30 years.
Since the March 11 disasters, Chubu Electric has drawn up safety measures that include building a 40-foot-high (12-meter-high) seawall nearly a mile (1.5 kilometers) long over the next two to three years, company officials said. The company also promised to install additional emergency backup generators and other equipment and improve the water tightness of the reactor buildings.
The plant does not have a concrete sea barrier now. Sand hills between the ocean and the plant are about 32 to 50 feet (10 to 15 meters) high, deemed enough to defend against a tsunami around 26 feet (8 meters) high, officials said.
Shizuoka Gov. Heita Kawakatsu called Friday's government request "a wise decision" and vowed to secure alternative sources of energy.
Residents of Shizuoka have long demanded a shutdown of the Hamaoka reactors. About 79,800 people live within a 6-mile (10-kilometer) radius of the plant.
The Hamaoka plant provides power to around 16 million people in central Japan including nearby Aichi, home of Toyota Motor Corp.
Automakers and other industries have had troubles with interrupted supply lines, parts shortages and damage to manufacturing plants because of the March 11 disasters.
The nationwide newspaper Yomiuri welcomed the government request to shut down the reactors despite concerns about a power crunch.
"The idea is to use the lesson we learned (from Fukushima)," the Yomiuri said, urging other utilities to also improve safety. "An accident and subsequent release of radiation could paralyze the entire country."
Thousands of people joined an anti-nuclear march Saturday in Tokyo's crowded Shibuya shopping and entertainment district, chanting "No nuke plants!"
The Fukushima Dai-ichi plant lost its power and cooling systems in the magnitude-9.0 earthquake and ensuing tsunami, triggering the world's worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl.
Radiation leaks have forced 80,000 people living within a 12-mile (20-kilometer) radius of the plant to leave their homes.
Since the Fukushima crisis unfolded, officials have acknowledged that tsunami safety measures at Japanese nuclear power plants are insufficient.
Tokyo Electric Power Co., operator of the Fukushima plant, has said the tsunami that wrecked critical power and cooling systems there was at least 46 feet (14 meters) high.
It said radioactivity inside the No. 1 reactor building has fallen to levels deemed safe for people wearing protective suits to enter after workers rapidly installed air filtering equipment Thursday — their first entry since shortly after the tsunami. Workers are to begin preparations as early as Sunday to install a cooling system.
___
Associated Press writer Shino Yuasa contributed to this report.

Read more: http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/Japan-utility-delays-decision-on-halting-reactors-1370009.php#ixzz1LfvczvOv

Report an earthquake

Earthquake

earthquake
GeoNet quickly locates the earthquakes that you feel in New Zealand, as well as routinely analysing more than 15,000 others each year.
The pattern of shallow earthquakes in New Zealand. The pattern of shallow earthquakes in New Zealand.
The pattern of deep earthquakes in New Zealand. The pattern of deep earthquakes in New Zealand.

What do you want to do?

Report an earthquake

Find out about New Zealand earthquakes

Find about about significant earthquakes in other parts of the world

GeoNet and Earthquakes

GeoNet analyses, locates and archives over 15,000 earthquakes each year within the New Zealand region. For the over 250 significant earthquakes felt in the New Zealand region each year, GeoNet provides the location and magnitude of the events within 30 minutes of their occurrence. Other significant events within the greater south-west Pacific region may be detected by our equipment, but we do not routinely locate these as the geometry of our recording network does not allow accurate epicentres and magnitudes to be determined. Details about these earthquakes are available from the United States Geological Survey.

Did you feel an earthquake?

If you have felt an earthquake recently, we would like to know where you were and what happened. This information will help us understand how your area might respond in future earthquakes. Your input will be used to make maps of how the intensity of shaking was distributed over the area which felt the earthquake. The questionnaire should only take a few minutes to complete.

Why isn't the earthquake I just felt listed?

It can take between fifteen and thirty minutes after a significant earthquake for the location and magnitude to be reviewed and the event to be listed on this web site. Sometimes earthquakes occur where the shaking was too slight to alert our duty team, or it is possible that you have experienced something that was not an earthquake. If you make a report and we are able to establish its location, it may be significant enough to be added to the Recent Quakes list. Very minor earthquakes that are felt may only be posted once they come to our attention through the reception of your reports; this can be some hours after they have happened.

How GeoNet Locates Earthquakes

Seismic traces showing P and S arrivals. Seismic traces showing P and S arrivals.
To make rapid locations of earthquakes GeoNet operates a country-wide network of seismic stations that transmit their data to the GeoNet Data Management Centre (DMC) where it is analysed by automated processes. If the automated processes detect an earthquake the Duty Response Team is notified and if the Duty Officer confirms that the earthquake is real and significant, the earthquake information is released.
The seismic stations operated by GeoNet consist of a seismometer and a seismograph. A seismometer is a sensitive instrument that generates a small electrical current in response to ground shaking. The electrical current is digitised by the seismograph and transmitted continuously to the DMC in real time. This digital recording of ground shaking is the raw data used to make earthquake locations. The seismic stations are supplemented by a network of strong-motion seismographs, which only transmit data whenever they detect a higher level of shaking, typically from earthquakes that will have been felt by the public.
The real-time seismic data is received by the DMC data reception computers located at Avalon (Lower Hutt) and Wairakei (near Taupo) and analysed automatically for possible earthquakes. The computer processes look for ground shaking that is distinct from the normal background activity (such as that caused by weather and oceans) and may be associated with an earthquake. These occurrences are called detections. If a detection is deemed significant, then the relevant portion of the data is parcelled up and sent to the DMC data analysis computers. They store all the detected earthquake data, grouping the detections from different stations into earthquake data sets. The detections are examined for P (primary) and S (secondary) wave arrivals from the earthquake, and the times of these arrivals are inverted against seismic velocity models for the earth to yield the best location for the event. The magnitude of the earthquake is determined at a station by measuring the maximum amplitude of the seismic signals, and relating them to the distance of the station from the event, together with the characteristics of the seismometer and seismograph. The magnitudes from all available stations are then averaged to give an overall value for the event.
Preliminary information for significant Recent Quakes is posted to this web site, whilst the locations and magnitudes of other earthquakes are available through the Quake Search facility as soon as they become available.
It also provides locally recorded data from global earthquakes to the International Seismological Centre in the United Kingdom, and preliminary earthquake information to the National Earthquake Information Center, part of the United States Geological Survey responsible for locating major earthquakes worldwide. The waveform data and the located hypocentres are freely available to the worldwide community of researchers through the Resources section of this website.

THE WORLD-WIDE EARTHQUAKE LOCATOR

QUAKE REPORT
Find out about the latest earthquakes around the world.
QUAKE MAPPING
View the lastest earthquakes on a world map, along with extra data such as plate boundaries, faults and volcanoes.
CATALOGUE QUERY
Search our earthquake catalogue, and map your results.
QUAKE PREDICTION
Find out about areas that are predicted to have an increased chance of experiencing a major earthquake.
QUAKE ANIMATION
View earthquakes over the past month as an SVG animation.
   

The World-Wide Earthquake Locator aims to provide up-to-date information and detailed dynamic maps of earthquakes across the world within a maximum of 24 hours of their occurence. This web site also includes a database of past earthquakes, an animation of the past month's earthquakes, and statistical earthquake prediction.

The World-Wide Earthquake Locator was originally developed by Bruce Gittings of the School of GeoScience at the University of Edinburgh in 1995 and it became an early illustration of a real-time Geographical Information System which makes use the internet World-Wide Web and the internet to map dynamic phenomena.
The Locator takes data from the National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC), part of the US Geological Survey, based in Golden, Colorado (USA). This data provides basic information about the location of recent earthquakes and their strength within hours of the events taking place.




Planet Science logo Web Feet logo Britannica logo Schoolzone logo



What are Earthquakes? An earthquake is manifested as a shaking of the ground resulting from a series of shock waves generated following the brittle failure of rocks within the earth's crust or upper mantle. The failure comes about due to the build up of stress which occurs because of the constant movement of blocks of the earth's crust known as the lithospheric plates. Failure occurs at a point, or in a fairly small zone, known as the focus with the epicentre being the point on the earth' surface directly above this focus. However, once failure has occurred, movement may persist along a zone of weakness - known as a fault - for a considerable distance, occasionally as much as 1000 km).
Many earthquakes occur each year, on average greater than 800,000, but most are small and not felt by humans. A severe earthquake, with a magnitude of greater than 8.0, can be expected every 8 to 10 years. Yet, a significant number of smaller earthquakes, which are still capable of destruction, occur each year.
Earthquakes show a marked spatial distribution. The vast majority are located within narrow zones which correspond to the boundaries of the plates. These plates are in continuous movement relative to each other, thought to be driven by convective processes in the earth's mantle, the region of rocks beneath the crust which are heated to the point of becoming soft or plastic.


Other Sources of Information:

Earthquake


Global earthquake epicenters, 1963–1998

Global plate tectonic movement
An earthquake (also known as a quake, tremor or temblor) is the result of a sudden release of energy in the Earth's crust that creates seismic waves. The seismicity or seismic activity of an area refers to the frequency, type and size of earthquakes experienced over a period of time. Earthquakes are measured using observations from seismometers. The moment magnitude is the most common scale on which earthquakes larger than approximately 5 are reported for the entire globe. The more numerous earthquakes smaller than magnitude 5 reported by national seismological observatories are measured mostly on the local magnitude scale, also referred to as the Richter scale. These two scales are numerically similar over their range of validity. Magnitude 3 or lower earthquakes are mostly almost imperceptible and magnitude 7 and over potentially cause serious damage over large areas, depending on their depth. The largest earthquakes in historic times have been of magnitude slightly over 9, although there is no limit to the possible magnitude. The most recent large earthquake of magnitude 9.0 or larger was a 9.0 magnitude earthquake in Japan in 2011 (as of March 2011), and it was the largest Japanese earthquake since records began. Intensity of shaking is measured on the modified Mercalli scale. The shallower an earthquake, the more damage to structures it causes, all else being equal.[1]
At the Earth's surface, earthquakes manifest themselves by shaking and sometimes displacement of the ground. When the epicenter of a large earthquake is located offshore, the seabed may be displaced sufficiently to cause a tsunami. Earthquakes can also trigger landslides, and occasionally volcanic activity.
In its most general sense, the word earthquake is used to describe any seismic event—whether natural or caused by humans—that generates seismic waves. Earthquakes are caused mostly by rupture of geological faults, but also by other events such as volcanic activity, landslides, mine blasts, and nuclear tests. An earthquake's point of initial rupture is called its focus or hypocenter. The epicenter is the point at ground level directly above the hypocenter.

Contents

[hide]

Naturally occurring earthquakes


Fault types
Tectonic earthquakes occur anywhere in the earth where there is sufficient stored elastic strain energy to drive fracture propagation along a fault plane. The sides of a fault move past each other smoothly and aseismically only if there are no irregularities or asperities along the fault surface that increase the frictional resistance. Most fault surfaces do have such asperities and this leads to a form of stick-slip behaviour. Once the fault has locked, continued relative motion between the plates leads to increasing stress and therefore, stored strain energy in the volume around the fault surface. This continues until the stress has risen sufficiently to break through the asperity, suddenly allowing sliding over the locked portion of the fault, releasing the stored energy. This energy is released as a combination of radiated elastic strain seismic waves, frictional heating of the fault surface, and cracking of the rock, thus causing an earthquake. This process of gradual build-up of strain and stress punctuated by occasional sudden earthquake failure is referred to as the elastic-rebound theory. It is estimated that only 10 percent or less of an earthquake's total energy is radiated as seismic energy. Most of the earthquake's energy is used to power the earthquake fracture growth or is converted into heat generated by friction. Therefore, earthquakes lower the Earth's available elastic potential energy and raise its temperature, though these changes are negligible compared to the conductive and convective flow of heat out from the Earth's deep interior.[2]

Earthquake fault types

There are three main types of fault that may cause an earthquake: normal, reverse (thrust) and strike-slip. Normal and reverse faulting are examples of dip-slip, where the displacement along the fault is in the direction of dip and movement on them involves a vertical component. Normal faults occur mainly in areas where the crust is being extended such as a divergent boundary. Reverse faults occur in areas where the crust is being shortened such as at a convergent boundary. Strike-slip faults are steep structures where the two sides of the fault slip horizontally past each other; transform boundaries are a particular type of strike-slip fault. Many earthquakes are caused by movement on faults that have components of both dip-slip and strike-slip; this is known as oblique slip.
Reverse faults, particularly those along convergent plate boundaries are associated with the most powerful earthquakes, including almost all of those of magnitude 8 or more. Strike-slip faults, particularly continental transforms can produce major earthquakes up to about magnitude 8. Earthquakes associated with normal faults are generally less than magnitude 7.
This is so because the energy released in an earthquake, and thus its magnitude, is proportional to the area of the fault that ruptures[3] and the stress drop. Therefore, the longer the length and the wider the width of the faulted area, the larger the resulting magnitude. The topmost, brittle part of the Earth’s crust, and the cool slabs of the tectonic plates that are descending down into the hot mantel, are the only parts of our planet which can store elastic energy and release it in fault ruptures. Rocks hotter than about 300 degrees Celcius flow in response to stress, they do not rupture in earthquakes.[4][5] The maximum observed lengths of ruptures and mapped faults, which may break in one go are approximately 1000 km. Examples are the earthquakes in Chile, 1960; Alaska, 1957; Sumatra, 2004, all in subduction zones. The longest earthquake ruptures on strike-slip faults, like the San Andreas Fault (1857, 1906), the North Anatolian Fault in Turkey (1939) and the Denali Fault in Alaska (2002), are about half to one third as long as the lengths along subducting plate margins, and those along normal faults are even shorter.
The most important parameter controlling the maximum earthquake magnitude on a fault is however not the maximum available length, but the available width because the latter varies by a factor of 20. Along converging plate margins, the dip angle of the rupture plane is very shallow, typically about 10 degrees[1]. Thus the width of the plane within the top brittle crust of the Earth can become 50 to 100 km (Tohoku, 2011; Alaska, 1964), making the most powerful earthquakes possible.
Strike-slip faults tend to be oriented near vertically, resulting in an approximate width of 10 km within the brittle crust[2], thus earthquakes with magnitudes much large than 8 are not possible. Maximum magnitudes along many normal faults are even more limited because many of them are located along spreading centers, as in Iceland, where the thickness of the brittle layer is only about 6 km.[6][3]
In addition, there exists a hierarchy of stress level in the three fault types. Thrust faults are generated by the highest, strike slip by intermediate, and normal faults by the lowest stress levels.[7] This can easily be understood by considering the direction of the greatest principal stress, the direction of the force that ‘pushes’ the rock mass during the faulting. In the case of normal faults, the rock mass is pushed down in a vertical direction, thus the pushing force (greatest principal stress) equals the weight of the rock mass itself. In the case of thrusting, the rock mass ‘escapes’ in the direction of the least principal stress, namely upward, lifting the rock mass up, thus the overburden equals the least principal stress. Strike-slip faulting is intermediate between the other two types described above. This difference in stress regime in the three faulting environments can contribute to differences in stress drop during faulting, which contributes to differences in the radiated energy, regardless of fault dimensions.

Earthquakes away from plate boundaries

Where plate boundaries occur within continental lithosphere, deformation is spread out over a much larger area than the plate boundary itself. In the case of the San Andreas fault continental transform, many earthquakes occur away from the plate boundary and are related to strains developed within the broader zone of deformation caused by major irregularities in the fault trace (e.g., the “Big bend” region). The Northridge earthquake was associated with movement on a blind thrust within such a zone. Another example is the strongly oblique convergent plate boundary between the Arabian and Eurasian plates where it runs through the northwestern part of the Zagros mountains. The deformation associated with this plate boundary is partitioned into nearly pure thrust sense movements perpendicular to the boundary over a wide zone to the southwest and nearly pure strike-slip motion along the Main Recent Fault close to the actual plate boundary itself. This is demonstrated by earthquake focal mechanisms.[8]
All tectonic plates have internal stress fields caused by their interactions with neighbouring plates and sedimentary loading or unloading (e.g. deglaciation[9]). These stresses may be sufficient to cause failure along existing fault planes, giving rise to intraplate earthquakes.[10]

Shallow-focus and deep-focus earthquakes

The majority of tectonic earthquakes originate at the ring of fire in depths not exceeding tens of kilometers. Earthquakes occurring at a depth of less than 70 km are classified as 'shallow-focus' earthquakes, while those with a focal-depth between 70 and 300 km are commonly termed 'mid-focus' or 'intermediate-depth' earthquakes. In subduction zones, where older and colder oceanic crust descends beneath another tectonic plate, deep-focus earthquakes may occur at much greater depths (ranging from 300 up to 700 kilometers).[11] These seismically active areas of subduction are known as Wadati-Benioff zones. Deep-focus earthquakes occur at a depth where the subducted lithosphere should no longer be brittle, due to the high temperature and pressure. A possible mechanism for the generation of deep-focus earthquakes is faulting caused by olivine undergoing a phase transition into a spinel structure.[12]

Earthquakes and volcanic activity

Earthquakes often occur in volcanic regions and are caused there, both by tectonic faults and the movement of magma in volcanoes. Such earthquakes can serve as an early warning of volcanic eruptions, as during the Mount St. Helens eruption of 1980.[13] Earthquake swarms can serve as markers for the location of the flowing magma throughout the volcanoes. These swarms can be recorded by seismometers and tiltmeters (a device that measures ground slope) and used as sensors to predict imminent or upcoming eruptions.[14]

Rupture dynamics

A tectonic earthquake begins by an initial rupture at a point on the fault surface, a process known as nucleation. The scale of the nucleation zone is uncertain, with some evidence, such as the rupture dimensions of the smallest earthquakes, suggesting that it is smaller than 100 m while other evidence, such as a slow component revealed by low-frequency spectra of some earthquakes, suggest that it is larger. The possibility that the nucleation involves some sort of preparation process is supported by the observation that about 40% of earthquakes are preceded by foreshocks. Once the rupture has initiated it begins to propagate along the fault surface. The mechanics of this process are poorly understood, partly because it is difficult to recreate the high sliding velocities in a laboratory. Also the effects of strong ground motion make it very difficult to record information close to a nucleation zone.[15]
Rupture propagation is generally modelled using a fracture mechanics approach, likening the rupture to a propagating mixed mode shear crack. The rupture velocity is a function of the fracture energy in the volume around the crack tip, increasing with decreasing fracture energy. The velocity of rupture propagation is orders of magnitude faster than the displacement velocity across the fault. Earthquake ruptures typically propagate at velocities that are in the range 70–90 % of the S-wave velocity and this is independent of earthquake size. A small subset of earthquake ruptures appear to have propagated at speeds greater than the S-wave velocity. These supershear earthquakes have all been observed during large strike-slip events. The unusually wide zone of coseismic damage caused by the 2001 Kunlun earthquake has been attributed to the effects of the sonic boom developed in such earthquakes. Some earthquake ruptures travel at unusually low velocities and are referred to as slow earthquakes. A particularly dangerous form of slow earthquake is the tsunami earthquake, observed where the relatively low felt intensities, caused by the slow propagation speed of some great earthquakes, fail to alert the population of the neighbouring coast, as in the 1896 Meiji-Sanriku earthquake.[15]

Earthquake clusters

Most earthquakes form part of a sequence, related to each other in terms of location and time.[16] Most earthquake clusters consist of small tremors that cause little to no damage, but there is a theory that earthquakes can recur in a regular pattern.[17]

Aftershocks

An aftershock is an earthquake that occurs after a previous earthquake, the mainshock. An aftershock is in the same region of the main shock but always of a smaller magnitude. If an aftershock is larger than the main shock, the aftershock is redesignated as the main shock and the original main shock is redesignated as a foreshock. Aftershocks are formed as the crust around the displaced fault plane adjusts to the effects of the main shock.[16]

Earthquake swarms

Earthquake swarms are sequences of earthquakes striking in a specific area within a short period of time. They are different from earthquakes followed by a series of aftershocks by the fact that no single earthquake in the sequence is obviously the main shock, therefore none have notable higher magnitudes than the other. An example of an earthquake swarm is the 2004 activity at Yellowstone National Park.[18]

Earthquake storms

Sometimes a series of earthquakes occur in a sort of earthquake storm, where the earthquakes strike a fault in clusters, each triggered by the shaking or stress redistribution of the previous earthquakes. Similar to aftershocks but on adjacent segments of fault, these storms occur over the course of years, and with some of the later earthquakes as damaging as the early ones. Such a pattern was observed in the sequence of about a dozen earthquakes that struck the North Anatolian Fault in Turkey in the 20th century and has been inferred for older anomalous clusters of large earthquakes in the Middle East.[19][20]

Size and frequency of occurrence

It is estimated that around 500,000 earthquakes occur each year, detectable with current instrumentation. About 100,000 of these can be felt.[21][22] Minor earthquakes occur nearly constantly around the world in places like California and Alaska in the U.S., as well as in Guatemala. Chile, Peru, Indonesia, Iran, Pakistan, the Azores in Portugal, Turkey, New Zealand, Greece, Italy, and Japan, but earthquakes can occur almost anywhere, including New York City, London, and Australia.[23] Larger earthquakes occur less frequently, the relationship being exponential; for example, roughly ten times as many earthquakes larger than magnitude 4 occur in a particular time period than earthquakes larger than magnitude 5. In the (low seismicity) United Kingdom, for example, it has been calculated that the average recurrences are: an earthquake of 3.7 - 4.6 every year, an earthquake of 4.7 - 5.5 every 10 years, and an earthquake of 5.6 or larger every 100 years.[24] This is an example of the Gutenberg-Richter law.

The Messina earthquake and tsunami took as many as 200,000 lives on December 28, 1908 in Sicily and Calabria.[25]
The number of seismic stations has increased from about 350 in 1931 to many thousands today. As a result, many more earthquakes are reported than in the past, but this is because of the vast improvement in instrumentation, rather than an increase in the number of earthquakes. The United States Geological Survey estimates that, since 1900, there have been an average of 18 major earthquakes (magnitude 7.0-7.9) and one great earthquake (magnitude 8.0 or greater) per year, and that this average has been relatively stable.[26] In recent years, the number of major earthquakes per year has decreased, though this is probably a statistical fluctuation rather than a systematic trend. More detailed statistics on the size and frequency of earthquakes is available from the United States Geological Survey (USGS).[27] Alternatively, some scientists suggest that the recent increase in major earthquakes could be explained by a cyclical pattern of periods of intense tectonic activity, interspersed with longer periods of low-intensity. However, accurate recordings of earthquakes only began in the early 1900s, so it is too early to categorically state that this is the case.[28]
Most of the world's earthquakes (90%, and 81% of the largest) take place in the 40,000-km-long, horseshoe-shaped zone called the circum-Pacific seismic belt, known as the Pacific Ring of Fire, which for the most part bounds the Pacific Plate.[29][30] Massive earthquakes tend to occur along other plate boundaries, too, such as along the Himalayan Mountains.[31]
With the rapid growth of mega-cities such as Mexico City, Tokyo and Tehran, in areas of high seismic risk, some seismologists are warning that a single quake may claim the lives of up to 3 million people.[32]

Induced seismicity

While most earthquakes are caused by movement of the Earth's tectonic plates, human activity can also produce earthquakes. Four main activities contribute to this phenomenon: storing large amounts of water behind a dam (and possibly building an extremely heavy building), drilling and injecting liquid into wells, and by coal mining and oil drilling.[33] Perhaps the best known example is the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China's Sichuan Province in May; this tremor resulted in 69,227 fatalities and is the 19th deadliest earthquake of all time. The Zipingpu Dam is believed to have fluctuated the pressure of the fault 1,650 feet (503 m) away; this pressure probably increased the power of the earthquake and accelerated the rate of movement for the fault.[34] The greatest earthquake in Australia's history is also claimed to be induced by humanity, through coal mining. The city of Newcastle was built over a large sector of coal mining areas. The earthquake has been reported to be spawned from a fault that reactivated due to the millions of tonnes of rock removed in the mining process.[35]

Measuring and locating earthquakes

Earthquakes can be recorded by seismometers up to great distances, because seismic waves travel through the whole Earth's interior. The absolute magnitude of a quake is conventionally reported by numbers on the Moment magnitude scale (formerly Richter scale, magnitude 7 causing serious damage over large areas), whereas the felt magnitude is reported using the modified Mercalli intensity scale (intensity II-XII).
Every tremor produces different types of seismic waves, which travel through rock with different velocities:
Propagation velocity of the seismic waves ranges from approx. 3 km/s up to 13 km/s, depending on the density and elasticity of the medium. In the Earth's interior the shock- or P waves travel much faster than the S waves (approx. relation 1.7 : 1). The differences in travel time from the epicentre to the observatory are a measure of the distance and can be used to image both sources of quakes and structures within the Earth. Also the depth of the hypocenter can be computed roughly.
In solid rock P-waves travel at about 6 to 7 km per second; the velocity increases within the deep mantle to ~13 km/s. The velocity of S-waves ranges from 2–3 km/s in light sediments and 4–5 km/s in the Earth's crust up to 7 km/s in the deep mantle. As a consequence, the first waves of a distant earth quake arrive at an observatory via the Earth's mantle.
Rule of thumb: On the average, the kilometer distance to the earthquake is the number of seconds between the P and S wave times 8.[36] Slight deviations are caused by inhomogeneities of subsurface structure. By such analyses of seismograms the Earth's core was located in 1913 by Beno Gutenberg.
Earthquakes are not only categorized by their magnitude but also by the place where they occur. The world is divided into 754 Flinn-Engdahl regions (F-E regions), which are based on political and geographical boundaries as well as seismic activity. More active zones are divided into smaller F-E regions whereas less active zones belong to larger F-E regions.

Effects of earthquakes


1755 copper engraving depicting Lisbon in ruins and in flames after the 1755 Lisbon earthquake, which killed an estimated 60,000 people. A tsunami overwhelms the ships in the harbor.
The effects of earthquakes include, but are not limited to, the following:

Shaking and ground rupture

Shaking and ground rupture are the main effects created by earthquakes, principally resulting in more or less severe damage to buildings and other rigid structures. The severity of the local effects depends on the complex combination of the earthquake magnitude, the distance from the epicenter, and the local geological and geomorphological conditions, which may amplify or reduce wave propagation.[37] The ground-shaking is measured by ground acceleration.
Specific local geological, geomorphological, and geostructural features can induce high levels of shaking on the ground surface even from low-intensity earthquakes. This effect is called site or local amplification. It is principally due to the transfer of the seismic motion from hard deep soils to soft superficial soils and to effects of seismic energy focalization owing to typical geometrical setting of the deposits.
Ground rupture is a visible breaking and displacement of the Earth's surface along the trace of the fault, which may be of the order of several metres in the case of major earthquakes. Ground rupture is a major risk for large engineering structures such as dams, bridges and nuclear power stations and requires careful mapping of existing faults to identify any likely to break the ground surface within the life of the structure.[38]

Landslides and avalanches

Earthquakes, along with severe storms, volcanic activity, coastal wave attack, and wildfires, can produce slope instability leading to landslides, a major geological hazard. Landslide danger may persist while emergency personnel are attempting rescue.[39]

Fires

Earthquakes can cause fires by damaging electrical power or gas lines. In the event of water mains rupturing and a loss of pressure, it may also become difficult to stop the spread of a fire once it has started. For example, more deaths in the 1906 San Francisco earthquake were caused by fire than by the earthquake itself.[40]

Soil liquefaction

Soil liquefaction occurs when, because of the shaking, water-saturated granular material (such as sand) temporarily loses its strength and transforms from a solid to a liquid. Soil liquefaction may cause rigid structures, like buildings and bridges, to tilt or sink into the liquefied deposits. This can be a devastating effect of earthquakes. For example, in the 1964 Alaska earthquake, soil liquefaction caused many buildings to sink into the ground, eventually collapsing upon themselves.[41]

Tsunami


The tsunami of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake
Tsunamis are long-wavelength, long-period sea waves produced by the sudden or abrupt movement of large volumes of water. In the open ocean the distance between wave crests can surpass 100 kilometers (62 miles), and the wave periods can vary from five minutes to one hour. Such tsunamis travel 600-800 kilometers per hour (373–497 miles per hour), depending on water depth. Large waves produced by an earthquake or a submarine landslide can overrun nearby coastal areas in a matter of minutes. Tsunamis can also travel thousands of kilometers across open ocean and wreak destruction on far shores hours after the earthquake that generated them.[42]
Ordinarily, subduction earthquakes under magnitude 7.5 on the Richter scale do not cause tsunamis, although some instances of this have been recorded. Most destructive tsunamis are caused by earthquakes of magnitude 7.5 or more.[42]

Floods

A flood is an overflow of any amount of water that reaches land.[43] Floods occur usually when the volume of water within a body of water, such as a river or lake, exceeds the total capacity of the formation, and as a result some of the water flows or sits outside of the normal perimeter of the body. However, floods may be secondary effects of earthquakes, if dams are damaged. Earthquakes may cause landslips to dam rivers, which collapse and cause floods.[44]
The terrain below the Sarez Lake in Tajikistan is in danger of catastrophic flood if the landslide dam formed by the earthquake, known as the Usoi Dam, were to fail during a future earthquake. Impact projections suggest the flood could affect roughly 5 million people.[45]

Tidal forces

Research work has shown a robust correlation between small tidally induced forces and non-volcanic tremor activity.[46][47][48][49]

Human impacts


Damaged infrastructure, one week after the 2007 Peru earthquake
An earthquake may cause injury and loss of life, road and bridge damage, general property damage, and collapse or destabilization (potentially leading to future collapse) of buildings. The aftermath may bring disease, lack of basic necessities, higher insurance premiums, Earthquakes can also cause volcanic eruptions, bringing further problems.

Major earthquakes

One of the most devastating earthquakes in recorded history occurred on 23 January 1556 in the Shaanxi province, China, killing more than 830,000 people (see 1556 Shaanxi earthquake).[50] Most of the population in the area at the time lived in yaodongs, artificial caves in loess cliffs, many of which collapsed during the catastrophe with great loss of life. The 1976 Tangshan earthquake, with death toll estimated to be between 240,000 to 655,000, is believed to be the largest earthquake of the 20th century by death toll.[51]
The largest earthquake that has been measured on a seismograph reached 9.5 magnitude, occurring on 22 May 1960.[21][22] Its epicenter was near Cañete, Chile. The energy released was approximately twice that of the next most powerful earthquake, the Good Friday Earthquake, which was centered in Prince William Sound, Alaska.[52][53] The ten largest recorded earthquakes have all been megathrust earthquakes; however, of these ten, only the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake is simultaneously one of the deadliest earthquakes in history.
Earthquakes that caused the greatest loss of life, while powerful, were deadly because of their proximity to either heavily populated areas or the ocean, where earthquakes often create tsunamis that can devastate communities thousands of kilometers away. Regions most at risk for great loss of life include those where earthquakes are relatively rare but powerful, and poor regions with lax, unenforced, or nonexistent seismic building codes.

Preparation

To predict the likelihood of future seismic activity, geologists and other scientists examine the rock of an area to determine if the rock appears "strained." Studying the faults of an area to study the buildup time it takes for the fault to build up stress sufficient for an earthquake also serves as an effective prediction technique.[54] Measurements of the amount of accumulated strain energy on the fault each year, time passed since the last major temblor, and the energy and power of the last earthquake are made.[54] Together the facts allow scientists to determine how much pressure it takes for the fault to generate an earthquake. Though this method is useful, it has only been implemented on California's San Andreas Fault.[54]
Today, there are ways to protect and prepare possible sites of earthquakes from severe damage, through the following processes: earthquake engineering, earthquake preparedness, household seismic safety, seismic retrofit (including special fasteners, materials, and techniques), seismic hazard, mitigation of seismic motion, and earthquake prediction. Seismic retrofitting is the modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion, or soil failure due to earthquakes. With better understanding of seismic demand on structures and with our recent experiences with large earthquakes near urban centers, the need of seismic retrofitting is well acknowledged. Prior to the introduction of modern seismic codes in the late 1960s for developed countries (US, Japan etc.) and late 1970s for many other parts of the world (Turkey, China etc.),[55] many structures were designed without adequate detailing and reinforcement for seismic protection. In view of the imminent problem, various research work has been carried out. Furthermore, state-of-the-art technical guidelines for seismic assessment, retrofit and rehabilitation have been published around the world - such as the ASCE-SEI 41[56] and the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE)'s guidelines.[57]
Studies about earthquake precursors are important to try predict strong earthquakes.

History


An image from a 1557 book

Pre-Middle Ages

From the lifetime of the Greek philosopher Anaxagoras in the 5th century BCE to the 14th century CE, earthquakes were usually attributed to "air (vapors) in the cavities of the Earth."[58] Thales of Miletus, who lived from 625-547 (BCE) was the only documented person who believed that earthquakes were caused by tension between the earth and water.[58] Other theories existed, including the Greek philosopher Anaxamines' (585-526 BCE) beliefs that short incline episodes of dryness and wetness caused seismic activity. The Greek philosopher Democritus (460-371BCE) blamed water in general for earthquakes.[58] Pliny the Elder called earthquakes "underground thunderstorms."[58]

Earthquakes in culture

Mythology and religion

In Norse mythology, earthquakes were explained as the violent struggling of the god Loki. When Loki, god of mischief and strife, murdered Baldr, god of beauty and light, he was punished by being bound in a cave with a poisonous serpent placed above his head dripping venom. Loki's wife Sigyn stood by him with a bowl to catch the poison, but whenever she had to empty the bowl the poison dripped on Loki's face, forcing him to jerk his head away and thrash against his bonds, which caused the earth to tremble.[59]
In Greek mythology, Poseidon was the cause and god of earthquakes. When he was in a bad mood, he struck the ground with a trident, causing earthquakes and other calamities. He also used earthquakes to punish and inflict fear upon people as revenge.[60]
In Japanese mythology, Namazu (鯰) is a giant catfish who causes earthquakes. Namazu lives in the mud beneath the earth, and is guarded by the god Kashima who restrains the fish with a stone. When Kashima lets his guard fall, Namazu thrashes about, causing violent earthquakes.

Popular culture

In modern popular culture, the portrayal of earthquakes is shaped by the memory of great cities laid waste, such as Kobe in 1995 or San Francisco in 1906.[61] Fictional earthquakes tend to strike suddenly and without warning.[61] For this reason, stories about earthquakes generally begin with the disaster and focus on its immediate aftermath, as in Short Walk to Daylight (1972), The Ragged Edge (1968) or Aftershock: Earthquake in New York (1998).[61] A notable example is Heinrich von Kleist's classic novella, The Earthquake in Chile, which describes the destruction of Santiago in 1647. Haruki Murakami's short fiction collection after the quake depicts the consequences of the Kobe earthquake of 1995.
The most popular single earthquake in fiction is the hypothetical "Big One" expected of California's San Andreas Fault someday, as depicted in the novels Richter 10 (1996) and Goodbye California (1977) among other works.[61] Jacob M. Appel's widely anthologized short story, A Comparative Seismology, features a con artist who convinces an elderly woman that an apocalyptic earthquake is imminent.[62] In Pleasure Boating in Lituya Bay, one of the stories in Jim Shepard's Like You'd Understand, Anyway, the "Big One" leads to an even more devastating tsunami.
In the film 2012 (2009), solar flares (geologically implausibly) affecting the Earth's core caused massive destabilization of the Earth's crust layers. This created destruction planet-wide with earthquakes and tsunamis, foreseen by the Mayan culture and myth surrounding the last year noted in the Mesoamerican calendar - 2012.
Contemporary depictions of earthquakes in film are variable in the manner in which they reflect human psychological reactions to the actual trauma that can be caused to directly afflicted families and their loved ones.[63] Disaster mental health response research emphasizes the need to be aware of the different roles of loss of family and key community members, loss of home and familiar surroundings, loss of essential supplies and services to maintain survival.[64][65] Particularly for children, the clear availability of caregiving adults who are able to protect, nourish, and clothe them in the aftermath of the earthquake, and to help them make sense of what has befallen them has been shown even more important to their emotional and physical health than the simple giving of provisions.[66] As was observed after other disasters involving destruction and loss of life and their media depictions, such as those of the 2001 World Trade Center Attacks or Hurricane Katrina—and has been recently observed in the 2010 Haiti Earthquake, it is also important not to pathologize the reactions to loss and displacement or disruption of governmental administration and services, but rather to validate these reactions, to support constructive problem-solving and reflection as to how one might improve the conditions of those affected.[67]

See also

References

  1. ^ Earthquake FAQ
  2. ^ Spence, William; S. A. Sipkin, G. L. Choy (1989). "Measuring the Size of an Earthquake". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2006-11-03.
  3. ^ Wyss, M. 1979, “Estimating expectable maximum magnitude of earthquakes from fault dimensions” Geology, 7, 336-340.
  4. ^ Sibson R. H. (1982) "Fault Zone Models, Heat Flow, and the Depth Distribution of Earthquakes in the Continental Crust of the United States", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol 72, No. 1, pp. 151-163
  5. ^ Sibson, R. H. (2002) „Geology of the crustal earthquake source“ International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, Volume 1, Part 1, page 455, eds. W H K Lee, H Kanamori, P C Jennings, and C. Kisslinger, Academic Press, ISBN-10 / ASIN: 0124406521
  6. ^ Hjaltadóttir S., 2010, "Use of relatively located microearthquakes to map fault patterns and estimate the thickness of the brittle crust in Southwest Iceland"
  7. ^ Schorlemmer D., S. Wiemer and M. Wyss, 2005, “Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes” Nature, 437, 539-542.
  8. ^ Talebian, M; Jackson, J (2004). "A reappraisal of earthquake focal mechanisms and active shortening in the Zagros mountains of Iran". Geophysical Journal International 156 (3): 506–526. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02092.x.
  9. ^ Nettles, M.; Ekström, G. (May 2010). "Glacial Earthquakes in Greenland and Antarctica". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 (1): 467–491. Bibcode 2010AREPS..38..467N. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152414. edit
  10. ^ Noson, Qamar, and Thorsen (1988). Washington State Earthquake Hazards: Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 85.
  11. ^ "M7.5 Northern Peru Earthquake of 26 September 2005" (PDF). National Earthquake Information Center. 17 October 2005. Retrieved 2008-08-01.
  12. ^ Greene II, H. W.; Burnley, P. C. (October 26, 1989). "A new self-organizing mechanism for deep-focus earthquakes". Nature 341 (6244): 733–737. doi:10.1038/341733a0.
  13. ^ Foxworthy and Hill (1982). Volcanic Eruptions of 1980 at Mount St. Helens, The First 100 Days: USGS Professional Paper 1249.
  14. ^ Watson, John; Watson, Kathie (January 7, 1998). "Volcanoes and Earthquakes". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved May 9, 2009.
  15. ^ a b National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Science of Earthquakes (2003). "5. Earthquake Physics and Fault-System Science". Living on an Active Earth: Perspectives on Earthquake Science. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. p. 418. ISBN 9780309065627. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  16. ^ a b "What are Aftershocks, Foreshocks, and Earthquake Clusters?".
  17. ^ "Repeating Earthquakes". United States Geological Survey. January 29, 2009. Retrieved May 11, 2009.
  18. ^ "Earthquake Swarms at Yellowstone". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-09-15.
  19. ^ Amos Nur (2000). "Poseidon’s Horses: Plate Tectonics and Earthquake Storms in the Late Bronze Age Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean". Journal of Archaeological Science 27 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0431. ISSN 0305-4403.
  20. ^ "Earthquake Storms". Horizon. 1 April 2003. Retrieved 2007-05-02.
  21. ^ a b "Earthquake Facts". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2010-04-25.
  22. ^ a b Pressler, Margaret Webb (14 April 2010). "More earthquakes than usual? Not really.". KidsPost (Washington Post: Washington Post): pp. C10.
  23. ^ "Earthquake Hazards Program". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2006-08-14.
  24. ^ "Seismicity and earthquake hazard in the UK". Quakes.bgs.ac.uk. Retrieved 2010-08-23.
  25. ^ "Italy's earthquake history." BBC News. October 31, 2002.
  26. ^ "Common Myths about Earthquakes". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2006-08-14.
  27. ^ "Earthquake Facts and Statistics: Are earthquakes increasing?". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2006-08-14.
  28. ^ The 10 biggest earthquakes in history, Australian Geographic, March 14, 2011.
  29. ^ "Historic Earthquakes and Earthquake Statistics: Where do earthquakes occur?". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2006-08-14.
  30. ^ "Visual Glossary - Ring of Fire". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2006-08-14.
  31. ^ Jackson, James, "Fatal attraction: living with earthquakes, the growth of villages into megacities, and earthquake vulnerability in the modern world," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1805 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 15 August 2006 vol. 364 no. 1845 1911-1925.
  32. ^ "Global urban seismic risk." Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science.
  33. ^ Madrigal, Alexis (4 June 2008). "Top 5 Ways to Cause a Man-Made Earthquake". Wired News (CondéNet). Retrieved 2008-06-05.
  34. ^ "How Humans Can Trigger Earthquakes". National Geographic. February 10, 2009. Retrieved April 24, 2009.
  35. ^ Brendan Trembath (January 9, 2007). "Researcher claims mining triggered 1989 Newcastle earthquake". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved April 24, 2009.
  36. ^ "Speed of Sound through the Earth". Hypertextbook.com. Retrieved 2010-08-23.
  37. ^ "On Shaky Ground, Association of Bay Area Governments, San Francisco, reports 1995,1998 (updated 2003)". Abag.ca.gov. Retrieved 2010-08-23.
  38. ^ Guidelines for evaluating the hazard of surface fault rupture, California Geological Survey
  39. ^ "Natural Hazards - Landslides". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-09-15.
  40. ^ "The Great 1906 San Francisco earthquake of 1906". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-09-15.
  41. ^ "Historic Earthquakes -1946 Anchorage Earthquake". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-09-15.
  42. ^ a b Noson, Qamar, and Thorsen (1988). Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 85. Washington State Earthquake Hazards.
  43. ^ MSN Encarta Dictionary. Flood. Retrieved on 2006-12-28. Archived 2009-10-31.
  44. ^ "Notes on Historical Earthquakes". British Geological Survey. Retrieved 2008-09-15.
  45. ^ "Fresh alert over Tajik flood threat". BBC News. 2003-08-03. Retrieved 2008-09-15.
  46. ^ Thomas, Amanda M.; Nadeau, Robert M.; Bürgmann, Roland (December 24, 2009). "Tremor-tide correlations and near-lithostatic pore pressure on the deep San Andreas fault". Nature 462 (7276): 1048–51. doi:10.1038/nature08654. PMID 20033046.
  47. ^ "Gezeitenkräfte: Sonne und Mond lassen Kalifornien erzittern" SPIEGEL online, 29.12.2009
  48. ^ Tamrazyan, Gurgen P. (1967). "Tide-forming forces and earthquakes". Icarus 7 (1–3): 59–65. Bibcode 1967Icar....7...59T. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(67)90047-4.
  49. ^ Tamrazyan, Gurgen P. (1968). "Principal regularities in the distribution of major earthquakes relative to solar and lunar tides and other cosmic forces". Icarus 9 (1–3): 574–92. Bibcode 1968Icar....9..574T. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(68)90050-X.
  50. ^ "Earthquakes with 50,000 or More Deaths". U.S. Geological Survey
  51. ^ Spignesi, Stephen J. [2005] (2005). Catastrophe!: The 100 Greatest Disasters of All Time. ISBN 0806525584
  52. ^ Kanamori Hiroo. "The Energy Release in Great Earthquakes". Journal of Geophysical Research. Retrieved 2010-10-10.
  53. ^ USGS. "How Much Bigger?". United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 2010-10-10.
  54. ^ a b c Watson, John; Watson, Kathie (October 23, 1997). "Predicting Earthquakes". Retrieved May 9, 2009.
  55. ^ "NZSEE Bulletin 39(2)-June 2006" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-08-23.
  56. ^ ASCE-SEI 41
  57. ^ "Contents" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-08-23.
  58. ^ a b c d "Earthquakes". Encyclopedia of World Environmental History. 1. Encyclopedia of World Environmental History. 2003. pp. 358–364.
  59. ^ Sturluson, Snorri (1220). Prose Edda. ISBN 1156786215.
  60. ^ Sellers, Paige (1997-03-03). "Poseidon". Encyclopedia Mythica. Retrieved 2008-09-02.
  61. ^ a b c d Van Riper, A. Bowdoin (2002). Science in popular culture: a reference guide. Westport: Greenwood Press. p. 60. ISBN 0313318220.
  62. ^ JM Appel. A Comparative Seismology. Weber Studies (first publication), Volume 18, Number 2.
  63. ^ Goenjian, Najarian; Pynoos, Steinberg; Manoukian, Tavosian; Fairbanks, AM; Manoukian, G; Tavosian, A; Fairbanks, LA (1994). "Posttraumatic stress disorder in elderly and younger adults after the 1988 earthquake in Armenia". Am J Psychiatry 151 (6): 895–901. PMID 8185000.
  64. ^ Wang, Gao; Shinfuku, Zhang; Zhao, Shen; Zhang, H; Zhao, C; Shen, Y (2000). "Longitudinal Study of Earthquake-Related PTSD in a Randomly Selected Community Sample in North China". Am J Psychiatry 157 (8): 1260–1266. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1260. PMID 10910788.
  65. ^ Goenjian, Steinberg; Najarian, Fairbanks; Tashjian, Pynoos (2000). "Prospective Study of Posttraumatic Stress, Anxiety, and Depressive Reactions After Earthquake and Political Violence". Am J Psychiatry 157 (6): 911–895. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.6.911.
  66. ^ Coates SW, Schechter D (2004). Preschoolers’ traumatic stress post-9/11: relational and developmental perspectives. Disaster Psychiatry Issue. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 27(3), 473-489.
  67. ^ Schechter, DS; Coates, SW; First, E (2002). "Observations of acute reactions of young children and their families to the World Trade Center attacks". Journal of ZERO-TO-THREE: National Center for Infants, Toddlers, and Families 22 (3): 9–13.

General references

External links

Educational

Seismological data centers

Europe

Japan

New Zealand

United States

Seismic scales

Scientific information

Miscellaneous